Search in
Sort by:

Question Status:

Search help

  • Simple searches use one or more words. Separate the words with spaces (cat dog) to search cat,dog or both. Separate the words with plus signs (cat +dog) to search for items that may contain cat but must contain dog.
  • You can further refine your search on the search results page, where you can search by keywords, author, topic. These can be combined with each other. Examples
    • cat dog --matches anything with cat,dog or both
    • cat +dog --searches for cat +dog where dog is a mandatory term
    • cat -dog -- searches for cat excluding any result containing dog
    • [cats] —will restrict your search to results with topic named "cats"
    • [cats] [dogs] —will restrict your search to results with both topics, "cats", and "dogs"

GBuffer / Render To Texture Oddities?

(I'm using UE 4.12.5 in this context.)

Edit: See my comment below for a workaround when using the Render To Texture Toolset with materials including roughness.

I was experimenting with rendering materials to texture and found some things that didn't make sense to me. Let me show some screenshots to set up the scenario.

Generate a gradient and send the same output to several material pins ...

alt text

GBuffers: Roughness visibly different from BaseColor, Metallic and Specular

alt text I'm assuming roughness is being gamma corrected to some color space (although it shouldn't be any more than any of the other linear math driven inputs like metallic or specular should it?)

\Engine\Content\ArtTools\RenderToTexture\ tools show the same issue.

I used the Render To Texture Toolset I exported the GBuffers from the material above to OpenEXR files.

alt text

I then directly imported those files as uncompressed HDR textures without modifying them in anyway (I only renamed them).

alt text

You can again see the same issue with Roughness. I'm not getting out the same values I'm putting in.

(For what it's worth doing a Pow(.45454545) gives me a somewhat close approximation of the original input so this does seem related to colorspace. However, it again confuses me why color space/gamma corrections for only roughness would come into play here. Everything should be in linear space from my understanding, or at least roughness, metallic and specular should all be ouput in the same color space).

I setup some nodes to illustrate the differences

alt text

(You'll likely need to open the image above in a new browser tab and zoom in 200% or more to see the differences discussed below.)

In the center of the image I have the four uncompressed HDR textures lined up side by side. BaseColor, Specular and Metallic appear identical (although they're not exactly, i'll explain that below) and look like the original input gradient. However the roughness is again clearly different from it's original source.

In the top right of the image I use blend_difference nodes to compare the source input to the roughness texture and the base color texture. As we know roughness is very different. Happily, BaseColor is extremely similar to the original source. My guess is the difference is due to the the limited 512 resolution of the BaseColor texture compared to the infinite resolution of the procedural source.

Below that I compare the BaseColor texture to the Metallic Texture. They are very close but there are differences where I would expect them to be digitally exact copies. Below that I compare Metallic to Specular and they are digitally exact copies as expected.

So the final questions are ..

1.) Why is roughness being shown in the GBuffer view (and exported via Render To Texture toolset/HighRes Screenshot feature) so drastically different than metallic/specular/basecolor when feed the same inputs?

2.) Why is BaseColor very similar too, but not identical to the Metallic and Specular outputs (which are identical) given all three had the same input?

My hunch is question #1 relates to an actual bug as it prevents getting anywhere near the same output as input for roughness when using Render To Texture toolset.

Question #2 is likely something subtle I don't understand about differences in the BaseColor, Metallic and Specular GBuffers (although i'd like to understand what that difference is if it can be explained easily).

Product Version: UE 4.12
more ▼

asked Jul 24 '16 at 07:33 AM in Bug Reports

avatar image

414 32 96 63

(comments are locked)
10|2000 characters needed characters left
Viewable by all users

2 answers: sort voted first

Hi Ed,

So I actually stumbled onto the source of this. Within the Engine Content under \BufferVisualization\ folder you'll find the various post process materials used to display the GBuffers. If you open the one for Roughness you'll see it is going through a power(2.2) node (approximating an sRGB to linear color conversion).

As expected from the experiments described above none of the other gbuffer visualization materials do this. So I really can't say why this is this way, maybe there was a good reason. But the down side is that these materials are also used for the Render To Texture Toolset.

A work around is simply to bypass that power(2.2) node as shown while using Render To Texture Toolset as shown in this screenshot.

alt text

When you do that, the four material attribute HDR images output by the RTTT look correct.

alt text

more ▼

answered Aug 02 '16 at 01:47 AM

avatar image

414 32 96 63

avatar image Ed Burgess ♦♦ STAFF Aug 02 '16 at 01:34 PM

Hey Tmek,

If I understood the developer correctly it seems that the maps are supposed to be displayed differently due to Metallic, Specular, and Roughness being in a linear color space vs Base color in sRGB space.

(Although Specular is currently in sRGB space which is a bug)

You may have a good point and I'm going to mark your comment as an answer in case others want this functionality/result. I'm also going to send an internal comment linking to your post so the developer can see!

Thank you for your investigation,

Ed Burgess

(comments are locked)
10|2000 characters needed characters left
Viewable by all users

Hi tmek,

I was able to reproduce this issue and I agree that this is unexpected behavior. I have logged a bug report in order to notify our developers to investigate this issue further. I have simplified the material slightly just to reduce the steps needed to reproduce this issue. We plan to release a public bug tracker for users to view soon and I will link it once it is live.

Thank you for posting this issue!

Ed Burgess

more ▼

answered Jul 25 '16 at 08:52 PM

avatar image tmek Jul 26 '16 at 06:35 PM

Thanks Ed,

I see this issue is on the new Issue Tracker but I think you should include the fact that exporting these gbuffers using Highres Screenshot feature or Render to Texture Toolset gives these same results. That is a more concerning issue as it could affect workflow as opposed to just seeing different roughness representation through the gbuffer visualizer on screen.


avatar image Ed Burgess ♦♦ STAFF Jul 27 '16 at 09:24 PM

Hi Tmek,

I posted on an internal comment expressing your concern. Also this is for other users who want to track this issue. Here is a link to the public JIRA: https://issues.unrealengine.com/issue/UE-33743

(comments are locked)
10|2000 characters needed characters left
Viewable by all users
Your answer
toggle preview:

Up to 5 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 5.2 MB each and 5.2 MB total.

Follow this question

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

Answers to this question